🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."